Cases
Advocates
Justices
Landmark Cases
Fun Stuff
Cameras in the Court

McDonough v. Smith (18-485)

Question

Was the Second Circuit correct in holding, contrary to the holdings of a majority of other circuits, that the statute of limitations for a Section 1983 claim based on fabrication of evidence in criminal proceedings begins to run when the defendant becomes aware of the tainted evidence and its improper use?

Petitioner: Edward G. McDonough

Respondent: Youel Smith

Granted: 2019-01-11 00:00:00

Decided: Pending

Argued: 2019-04-17 11:07:00

Uploaded: 2019-06-08 13:10:00

Advocates: Neal Kumar Katyal, Jeffrey B. Wall, Thomas J. O'Connor

Links: Oyez | Youtube

Tags:




Neal Kumar Katyal

Town of Chester v. Laroe Estates, Inc. (16-605)

Town of Chester v. Laroe Estates, Inc. (16-605)

2017-04-17 11:03:00
Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission v. American Humanist Association (18-18)

Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission v. American Humanist Association (18-18)

2019-02-27 11:00:00
Trump v. Hawaii (17-965)

Trump v. Hawaii (17-965)

2018-04-25 10:02:00
McDonough v. Smith (18-485)

McDonough v. Smith (18-485)

2019-04-17 11:07:00
See more cases with Neal Kumar Katyal

Jeffrey B. Wall

Gundy v. United States (17-6086)

Gundy v. United States (17-6086)

2018-10-02 10:00:00
United States v. Aurelius Investment (18-1514)

United States v. Aurelius Investment (18-1514)

2019-10-15 10:06:00
Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission v. American Humanist Association (18-18)

Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission v. American Humanist Association (18-18)

2019-02-27 11:00:00
The American Legion v. American Humanist Association (17-1717)

The American Legion v. American Humanist Association (17-1717)

2019-02-27 10:00:00
See more cases with Jeffrey B. Wall

You have an error in your SQL syntax; check the manual that corresponds to your MySQL server version for the right syntax to use near 'Connor%' ORDER BY RAND() LIMIT 4' at line 1