Cox v. United States



Facts of the Case

This case was consolidated for argument with Dalmazzi v. United States (16-961) and Ortiz v. United States (16-1423).

Question

  1. Does the Court have jurisdiction to review two of the consolidated cases under 28 U.S.C. § 1259(3)?
  2. Does Judge Martin T. Mitchell’s simultaneous service on the US Court of Military Commission Review (CMCR) and the US Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals (AFCCA) violate the Appointments Clause?
  3. Does Judge Mitchell’s service on the CMCR disqualify him from continuing to serve on the AFCCA?
  4. Did the US Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces err in holding Petitioner’s claims moot?

Conclusion

In a per curiam opinion, the Court dismissed the writ of certiorari as improvidently granted in this case and in the consolidated case Dalmazzi v. United States (16-961). The Court reached the merits and issued a decision in the third consolidated case only, Ortiz v. United States (16-1423).