Cases
Advocates
Justices
Landmark Cases
Fun Stuff
Cameras in the Court

Ohio v. American Express Co. (16-1454)

Question

Under the "rule of reason," was the government's showing that American Express’s anti-steering provisions stifled price competition on the merchant side of the credit-card platform sufficient to prove anti-competitive effects, thereby shifting to American Express the burden of establishing pro-competitive benefits from the provisions?

Petitioner: State of Ohio, et al.

Respondent: American Express Company, et al.

Granted: 2017-10-16 00:00:00

Decided: 2018-06-25 00:00:00

Argued: 2018-02-26 11:09:00

Uploaded: 2018-03-02 17:16:00

Advocates: Eric E. Murphy, Evan R. Chesler, Malcolm L. Stewart

Links: Oyez | Opinion | Youtube

Tags: Antitrust Law


Eric E. Murphy

Husted v. A. Philip Randolph Institute (16-980)

Husted v. A. Philip Randolph Institute (16-980)

2018-01-10 10:04:00
Nat

Nat'l Ass'n of Manufacturers v. Dept. of Defense (16-299)

2017-10-11 10:04:00
Ohio v. American Express Co. (16-1454)

Ohio v. American Express Co. (16-1454)

2018-02-26 11:09:00
See more cases with Eric E. Murphy

Malcolm L. Stewart

Peter v. NantKwest, Inc. (18-801)

Peter v. NantKwest, Inc. (18-801)

2019-10-07 10:11:00
Return Mail, Inc. v. United States Postal Service (17-1594)

Return Mail, Inc. v. United States Postal Service (17-1594)

2019-02-19 10:00:00
Oil States Energy Services LLC v. Greene

Oil States Energy Services LLC v. Greene's Energy Group, LLC (16-712)

2017-11-27 10:05:00
Ohio v. American Express Co. (16-1454)

Ohio v. American Express Co. (16-1454)

2018-02-26 11:09:00
See more cases with Malcolm L. Stewart