Cases
Advocates
Justices
Landmark Cases
Fun Stuff
Cameras in the Court

Lagos v. United States (16-1519)

Question

Does the Mandatory Victims Restitution Act, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3663A(b)(4), cover costs that were neither “required nor requested” by the government, including costs incurred for the victim’s own purposes and that were not prompted by any official government action?

Petitioner: Sergio Fernando Lagos

Respondent: United States

Granted: 2018-01-12 00:00:00

Decided: 2018-05-29 00:00:00

Argued: 2018-04-18 10:07:00

Uploaded: 2018-04-21 16:45:00

Advocates: Daniel L. Geyser, Michael R. Huston

Links: Oyez | Opinion | Youtube

Tags: Mandatory Victims Restitution Act




Daniel L. Geyser

Obduskey v. McCarthy & Holthus LLP (17-1307)

Obduskey v. McCarthy & Holthus LLP (17-1307)

2019-01-07 11:09:00
Digital Realty Trust, Inc. v. Somers (16-1276)

Digital Realty Trust, Inc. v. Somers (16-1276)

2017-11-28 11:11:00
Lagos v. United States (16-1519)

Lagos v. United States (16-1519)

2018-04-18 10:07:00
Henry Schein Inc. v. Archer and White Sales Inc. (17-1272)

Henry Schein Inc. v. Archer and White Sales Inc. (17-1272)

2018-10-29 10:06:00
See more cases with Daniel L. Geyser

Michael R. Huston

Lagos v. United States (16-1519)

Lagos v. United States (16-1519)

2018-04-18 10:07:00
Kansas v. Glover (18-556)

Kansas v. Glover (18-556)

2019-11-04 10:00:00
Dawson v. Steager (17-419)

Dawson v. Steager (17-419)

2018-12-03 10:10:00
Smith v. Berryhill (17-1606)

Smith v. Berryhill (17-1606)

2019-03-18 00:00:00
See more cases with Michael R. Huston