Cases
Advocates
Justices
Landmark Cases
Fun Stuff
Cameras in the Court

Dahda v. United States (17-43)

Question

Does Title III of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 require suppression of evidence obtained pursuant to a wiretap order that is facially deficient because it exceeds the judge’s territorial jurisdiction?

Petitioner: Los Rovell Dahda, et al.

Respondent: United States of America

Granted: 2017-10-16 00:00:00

Decided: 2018-05-14 00:00:00

Argued: 2018-02-21 11:12:00

Uploaded: 2018-02-23 15:03:00

Advocates: Kannon K. Shanmugam, Zachary D. Tripp

Links: Oyez | Opinion | Youtube

Tags: Criminal Rights and Process




Kannon K. Shanmugam

Henry Schein Inc. v. Archer and White Sales Inc. (17-1272)

Henry Schein Inc. v. Archer and White Sales Inc. (17-1272)

2018-10-29 10:06:00
Republic of Sudan v. Harrison (16-1094)

Republic of Sudan v. Harrison (16-1094)

2018-11-07 10:03:00
Helsinn Healthcare S.A. v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA Inc. (17-1229)

Helsinn Healthcare S.A. v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA Inc. (17-1229)

2018-12-04 11:05:00
Obduskey v. McCarthy & Holthus LLP (17-1307)

Obduskey v. McCarthy & Holthus LLP (17-1307)

2019-01-07 11:09:00
See more cases with Kannon K. Shanmugam

Zachary D. Tripp

Dahda v. United States (17-43)

Dahda v. United States (17-43)

2018-02-21 11:12:00
Rubin v. Islamic Republic of Iran (16-534)

Rubin v. Islamic Republic of Iran (16-534)

2017-12-04 11:11:00
WesternGeco LLC v. ION Geophysical Corp. (16-1011)

WesternGeco LLC v. ION Geophysical Corp. (16-1011)

2018-04-16 10:57:00
Mission Product Holdings, Inc. v. Tempnology, LLC (17-1657)

Mission Product Holdings, Inc. v. Tempnology, LLC (17-1657)

2019-02-20 10:00:00
See more cases with Zachary D. Tripp