Cases
Advocates
Justices
Landmark Cases
Fun Stuff
Cameras in the Court

Weyerhaeuser Company v. United States Fish and Wildlife Service (17-71)

Question

(1) Does the Endangered Species Act prohibit designation of privately owned land as unoccupied critical habitat that is neither habitat nor essential to species conservation?

Is an agency determination not to exclude an area from critical habitat due to the economic impact of designation subject to judicial review?

Petitioner: Weyerhaeuser Company

Respondent: United States Fish and Wildlife Service, et al.

Granted: 2018-01-22 00:00:00

Decided: 2018-11-27 00:00:00

Argued: 2018-10-01 10:00:00

Uploaded: 2018-10-05 17:30:00

Advocates: Edwin S. Kneedler, Timothy S. Bishop

Links: Oyez | Opinion | Youtube

Tags: Land Ownership, Endangered Species Act




Edwin S. Kneedler

Florida v. Georgia (142-orig)

Florida v. Georgia (142-orig)

2018-01-08 11:05:00
NFIB v. Sebelius (11-393)

NFIB v. Sebelius (11-393)

2012-03-28 10:19:00
Abbott v. Perez (17-586)

Abbott v. Perez (17-586)

2018-04-24 10:00:00
Weyerhaeuser Company v. United States Fish and Wildlife Service (17-71)

Weyerhaeuser Company v. United States Fish and Wildlife Service (17-71)

2018-10-01 10:00:00
See more cases with Edwin S. Kneedler

Timothy S. Bishop

Weyerhaeuser Company v. United States Fish and Wildlife Service (17-71)

Weyerhaeuser Company v. United States Fish and Wildlife Service (17-71)

2018-10-01 10:00:00
Nat

Nat'l Ass'n of Manufacturers v. Dept. of Defense (16-299)

2017-10-11 10:04:00
See more cases with Timothy S. Bishop