Cases
Advocates
Justices
Landmark Cases
Fun Stuff
Cameras in the Court

Quarles v. United States (17-778)

Question

Does the generic definition of burglary, established by the US Supreme Court in Taylor v. United States, 495 U.S. 575 (1990), require proof that intent to commit a crime was present at the time of unlawful entry or first unlawful remaining, or only that the defendant formed such intent while “remaining in” the building or structure?

Petitioner: Jamar Alonzo Quarles

Respondent: United States

Granted: 2019-01-11 00:00:00

Decided: Pending

Argued: 2019-04-24 00:00:00

Uploaded: 2019-04-28 07:00:00

Advocates: Jeremy C. Marwell, Zachary D. Tripp

Links: Oyez | Youtube

Tags: Criminal Rights and Process


Related Cases

 ()

()



Zachary D. Tripp

Mission Product Holdings, Inc. v. Tempnology, LLC (17-1657)

Mission Product Holdings, Inc. v. Tempnology, LLC (17-1657)

2019-02-20 10:00:00
Nielsen v. Preap (16-1363)

Nielsen v. Preap (16-1363)

2018-10-10 10:00:00
Rubin v. Islamic Republic of Iran (16-534)

Rubin v. Islamic Republic of Iran (16-534)

2017-12-04 11:11:00
Dahda v. United States (17-43)

Dahda v. United States (17-43)

2018-02-21 11:12:00
See more cases with Zachary D. Tripp