Mathena v. Malvo (18-217)
Question
Does the decision in Montgomery v. Louisiana modify a "substantive rule of constitutional law" such that it must be given retroactive effect, requiring the respondent’s sentences of life without the possibility of parole to be vacated?Petitioner: Randall Mathena
Respondent: Lee Boyd Malvo
Granted: 2019-03-18 00:00:00
Decided: Pending
Argued: 2019-10-16 13:00:00
Uploaded: 2019-10-19 01:59:00
Advocates: Toby J. Heytens, Eric J. Feigin, Danielle Spinelli
Tags: Criminal Rights and Process
Related Cases
()
