Cases
Advocates
Justices
Landmark Cases
Fun Stuff
Cameras in the Court

Rucho v. Common Cause (18-422)

Question

1. Do the plaintiffs in this case have standing to pursue their partisan gerrymandering claims? 2. Are the plaintiffs’ partisan gerrymandering claims justiciable? 3. Is North Carolina’s 2016 congressional map an unconstitutional partisan gerrymander?

Petitioner: Robert A. Rucho, et al.

Respondent: Common Cause, et al.

Granted: 2018-10-03 00:00:00

Decided: Pending

Argued: 2019-03-26 10:12:00

Uploaded: 2019-04-01 22:33:00

Advocates: Paul D. Clement, Emmet J. Bondurant, II, Allison J. Riggs

Links: Oyez | Youtube

Tags: Voting Rights and Redistricting




Paul D. Clement

Seila Law v. CFPB (19-7)

Seila Law v. CFPB (19-7)

2020-03-03 10:09:00
District of Columbia v. Heller (07-290)

District of Columbia v. Heller (07-290)

2008-03-18 10:06:00
Department of Health/Human Services v. Florida Pt. 2 (11-398_2)

Department of Health/Human Services v. Florida Pt. 2 (11-398_2)

2012-03-27 10:00:00
Retirement Plans Committee of IBM v. Jander (18-1165)

Retirement Plans Committee of IBM v. Jander (18-1165)

2019-11-06 11:08:00
See more cases with Paul D. Clement

Allison J. Riggs

Abbott v. Perez (17-586)

Abbott v. Perez (17-586)

2018-04-24 10:00:00
Rucho v. Common Cause (18-422)

Rucho v. Common Cause (18-422)

2019-03-26 10:12:00
See more cases with Allison J. Riggs