Cases
Advocates
Justices
Landmark Cases
Fun Stuff
Cameras in the Court

Lamone v. Benisek (18-726)

Question

1. Are the various legal claims articulated by the three-judge district court are unmanageable?
2. Did the three-judge district court err in granting the plaintffs’ motion for summary judgment?
3. Did the three-judge district court abuse its discretion in entering an injunction despite the plaintiffs’ years-long delay in seeking injunctive relief?

Petitioner: Linda H. Lamone, et al.

Respondent: O. John Benisek, et al.

Granted: 2018-12-06 00:00:00

Decided: Pending

Argued: 2019-03-26 11:25:00

Uploaded: 2019-03-29 19:13:00

Advocates: Steven M. Sullivan, Michael B. Kimberly

Links: Oyez | Youtube

Tags: Voting Rights and Redistricting, Gerrymandering


Related Cases

Gill v. Whitford (16-1161)

Gill v. Whitford (16-1161)

2017-10-03 10:04:00


Michael B. Kimberly

Smith v. Berryhill (17-1606)

Smith v. Berryhill (17-1606)

2019-03-18 00:00:00
Benisek v. Lamone (17-333)

Benisek v. Lamone (17-333)

2018-03-28 10:03:00
Lamone v. Benisek (18-726)

Lamone v. Benisek (18-726)

2019-03-26 11:25:00
See more cases with Michael B. Kimberly