Cases
Advocates
Justices
Landmark Cases
Fun Stuff
Cameras in the Court

Department of Homeland Security v. Regents of the University of California (18-587)

Question

  1. Is the Department of Homeland Security's decision to wind down the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) policy judicially reviewable?
  2. Is DHS's decision to wind down the DACA policy lawful?

Petitioner: Department of Homeland Security, et al.

Respondent: Regents of the University of California, et al.

Granted: 2019-06-28 00:00:00

Decided: Pending

Argued: 2019-11-12 10:06:00

Uploaded: 2019-11-15 12:30:00

Advocates: Noel J. Francisco, Theodore B. Olson, Michael J. Mongan

Links: Oyez | Youtube

Tags: DACA, DHS




Noel J. Francisco

R.G. & G.R. Harris Funeral Homes Inc. v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (18-107)

R.G. & G.R. Harris Funeral Homes Inc. v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (18-107)

2019-10-08 11:08:00
Masterpiece Cakeshop, Ltd. v. CCRC (16-111)

Masterpiece Cakeshop, Ltd. v. CCRC (16-111)

2017-12-05 10:03:00
Seila Law v. CFPB (19-7)

Seila Law v. CFPB (19-7)

2020-03-03 10:09:00
Apple v. Pepper (17-204)

Apple v. Pepper (17-204)

2018-11-26 10:05:00
See more cases with Noel J. Francisco

Theodore B. Olson

United States v. Aurelius Investment (18-1514)

United States v. Aurelius Investment (18-1514)

2019-10-15 10:06:00
Financial Oversight and Management Board for Puerto Rico v. Aurelius Investment, LLC (18-1334)

Financial Oversight and Management Board for Puerto Rico v. Aurelius Investment, LLC (18-1334)

2019-10-15 10:06:00
Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission REARGUMENT (08-205_r)

Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission REARGUMENT (08-205_r)

2009-03-24 10:05:00
Aurelius Investment v. Puerto Rico (18-1475)

Aurelius Investment v. Puerto Rico (18-1475)

2019-10-15 10:06:00
See more cases with Theodore B. Olson